I just hate it when I see a product that catches my
attention at first glance; I’m talking stop in your tracks attention grabbing,
and then when you see it in reality, it looks like a big, old, brown lump!!
I saw this beautiful pair of pastel blue suede pumps from Ruby+Ed in Emerald Street’s daily newsletter, which I immediately fell in
love with.
Going on the Ruby+Ed website to purchase them; I was
confronted by these . . .
Are these even the same freaking shoes??? They don’t even
look remotely the same!!!
And why the hell is this wallflower version more expensive
than the one shown on the Emerald Street newsletter??
Doesn’t this even classify as false advertising? If not, can
I protest on the grounds on emotional distress
*Amendment - Just been informed (quite speedily might I add) by the Ruby+Ed's PR Team that there were a few things I might have missed or were not made clear on the Emerald Street Newsletter or their website.
The pumps were priced ‘From £35’ (as they have a canvas and suede version of the shoe) and in the companies T&C, it states that you get a ribbon laces when you type in the code "NEON' in the checkout.
*Amendment - Just been informed (quite speedily might I add) by the Ruby+Ed's PR Team that there were a few things I might have missed or were not made clear on the Emerald Street Newsletter or their website.
The pumps were priced ‘From £35’ (as they have a canvas and suede version of the shoe) and in the companies T&C, it states that you get a ribbon laces when you type in the code "NEON' in the checkout.
